<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government subsidies &#8211; some alternatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vaesir.com/energy/government-subsidies-some-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vaesir.com/energy/government-subsidies-some-alternatives/</link>
	<description>Energy · Environment · Engineering · Economics · Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.vaesir.com/energy/government-subsidies-some-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaesir.com/?p=26#comment-9</guid>
		<description>You raise some very interesting points. I particularly like the low interest govt loans.

Another point which I think is important is the related infrastructure for renewable power plants - particularly transmission lines.

It seems that so many renewable energy &#039;dense&#039; sites - like geothermal and wind - are concentrated in areas away from major population sites. Hence the necessity of constructing transmission lines adds considerably to the overall cost of the project  (I&#039;m thinking particularly about Geodynamics).  In contrast an expansion of a coal-fired power  plant (or new one) does not face this cost as it can be sited near existing infrastructure.  

I don&#039;t know how much it would cost, but I think it would be good if the Govt could partially subsidise, if not completely, the cost of transmission lines to the national grid provided the renewable source was of a particular capacity.

Also have a look at the proposal of Dr Gregor Czisch: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/windfuelled-supergrid-offers-clean-power-to-europe-760431.html

Anyway - keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise some very interesting points. I particularly like the low interest govt loans.</p>
<p>Another point which I think is important is the related infrastructure for renewable power plants &#8211; particularly transmission lines.</p>
<p>It seems that so many renewable energy &#8216;dense&#8217; sites &#8211; like geothermal and wind &#8211; are concentrated in areas away from major population sites. Hence the necessity of constructing transmission lines adds considerably to the overall cost of the project  (I&#8217;m thinking particularly about Geodynamics).  In contrast an expansion of a coal-fired power  plant (or new one) does not face this cost as it can be sited near existing infrastructure.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how much it would cost, but I think it would be good if the Govt could partially subsidise, if not completely, the cost of transmission lines to the national grid provided the renewable source was of a particular capacity.</p>
<p>Also have a look at the proposal of Dr Gregor Czisch: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/windfuelled-supergrid-offers-clean-power-to-europe-760431.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/windfuelled-supergrid-offers-clean-power-to-europe-760431.html</a></p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
